The Lawrence Family Medicine Residency is committed to research and provides assistance with project planning,
research design, implementation and manuscript preparation. A list of resident publications and presentations
at state and national meetings is available from the residency office.
The residents at the Lawrence Family Medicine Residency were formerly required to research their own panels
for Quality Assurance and the class of 2008 was the last to do so.
Letters to the editor and posters at regional and national conferences are encouraged and supported with the
help of the Research Director, Anthony Valdini, MD. Additionally, collaboration with faculty or fellows
conducting existing projects has provided an introduction to research for some residents. Residents are
encouraged to join research teams when they discover a project of interest. It is hoped that exposure to
these opportunities will foster a more rigorous approach to interpretation of the literature and enable
residents to ask and answer clinical questions intelligently.
A monthly Research Meeting is scheduled for residents and faculty. Residents are required to attend
(rotation specific), regardless of whether they have an ongoing project or not. Other attendees include
members of the Lawrence General Hospital staff and the Greater Lawrence Family Health Center and members
of the local medical community. The usual agenda for these meetings includes progress reports about
research in progress, brainstorming new ideas, and how to move beyond roadblocks in research.
Epidemiologic and statistical principles are reviewed as appropriate to the on-going projects and also to
cover basic concepts.
We have computer software available such as Dynamed, S.P.S.S., MD Consult, OVID, Up to Date, and EpiInfo,
and access to other Internet sites to assist with the research process. The LGH hospital librarian, an
expert in computer-assisted search methods, is paid to assist the residents and faculty in any of their
research needs.
Residents are required to have produced a scholarly project as a graduation requirement
The class of 2008 produced a QI/research project supervised by Dean Cleghorn, EdD during their R1 year.
1) The classes of 2009 & 2010 will choose their topics by July 31 2008,
2) To be approved by the research director by August 15th ’08. See Scholarly Project Selection Form
3) Residents are then charged with completion of their projects by 5/31/2009 for the class of 2009;
12/31/2009 for the class of 2010, thenceforward midyear of PGY3.
4) Going forward, the projects will begin as a 2nd year activity.
5) Advisors for the projects will include:
- Academic advisors +
- Persons selected by residents for additional assistance
- Advisors agreement to work with residents indicated by signing scholarly
project selection
6) Projects are selected from the following “menu” of choices to fulfill the Residency Research Requirement:
NOTE a- g are reproduced on the “back page” of the Project Selection Form.
- Original research involving a clear research question, hypothesis,
then description of background (including literature review), methods including sample size
calculations and statistical power, and the intervention, results, and a discussion including
limitations, and conclusion.
- Proof of resident’s substantial contribution to the intellectual
portion of an ongoing or past project, involving a written description of her role in literature
review, design, communication with the IRB, implementation, analysis. This should account for over
20 hours work. The write up should make their role abundantly clear. – 500 words should be
sufficient. Written approval is required in order for a resident to use their role in an ongoing
or past project to satisfy the RRR.
- QI project as in “a” above.
- A PEPID or Help desk article done through FPIN. Note, the latter
requires a faculty co-author who has done a help desk article, HDA, previously.
- Project resulting in a presentation at a state, national or
international meeting. Posters count here, and a copy of the abstract or poster should be
submitted along with a written explanation of their roles in the project that clearly indicates
their contribution (see b above)
- Case report – follow guidelines in McCarthy and Reilly Family Med
2003 “How to write a case report” this should be a clinical review with a “point,” that is an
uncommon presentation of a common problem, an uncommon presentation of a “dangerous” diagnosis,
or a unifying synthesis of potentially disparate symptoms/signs into an organized diagnosis, with
treatment plan. (the latter would focus on critical clinical thinking). Case report doesn’t have
to be published but should be suitable for same, as judged by residency director and research
director. It is hoped that the case report will be presented at noontime case conference.
- OR – another project approved by the research director meeting the
intellectual and skills goals of the RRR, Residency Research Requirement, i.e., active participation
in research and understanding and utilizing basic epidemiology, research design, and analysis.
- A forum for resident presentations of their projects will be set up
for each spring.
7) A forum for resident presentations of their projects will be set up for each spring.
- Original research involving a clear research question, hypothesis,
then description of background (including literature review), methods including sample size
calculations and statistical power, and the intervention, results, and a discussion including
limitations, and conclusion
- Proof of resident’s substantial contribution to the intellectual
portion of an ongoing project, involving a written description of her role in literature review,
design, communication with the IRB, implementation, analysis. This should account for over 20
hours work. The write up should make their role abundantly clear. – 500 words should be
sufficient. Written approval is required in order for a resident to use their role in an
ongoing project to satisfy the RRR.
- QI project as in “a” above
- A PEPID or Help desk article done through FPIN. Note the latter
requires a faculty co-author who has done a help desk article, HDA, previously.
- PEPID, simple response to EBM question for the palm pilot
15-20 hours work. Suitable for students, residents, clinical faculty. 10-15 hours
over 8-10 weeks.
- Evidence Based Practice – Help Desk Answers (HDAs)A bit longer
and suitable for residents, clinical educators, faculty with little time for writing.
Also formulaic and based on research form 3-4 pre-determined databases (period). Ten
hours over 6-8 weeks. Peer reviewed.
- Project resulting in a presentation at a state, national or
international meeting. Posters count here, and a copy of the abstract or poster should
be submitted along with a written explanation of their roles in the project that clearly
indicates their continuation.
- Case report – follow guidelines in McCarthy and Reilly Family
Med 2003 “How to write a case report” this should be a clinical review with a “point” that
is an uncommon presentation of a common problem, an uncommon presentation of a “dangerous”
diagnosis, or a unifying synthesis of potentially disparate symptoms/signs into an organized
diagnosis, with treatment plan. (the latter would focus on critical clinical thinking). Case
report doesn’t have to be published but should be suitable for same, as judged by residency
director and research director. It is hoped that the case report will be presented at noontime
case conference.
- OR – another project approved by the research director meeting the
intellectual and skills goals of the RRR, i.e., active participation in research and understanding
and utilizing basic epidemiology, research design, and analysis.
|